Search for on  
Saturday, July 31, 2010
     


Click here
 

CWA: RU-486 Claims Two More Women’s Lives     3/17/2006

Concerned Women for America (CWA) expressed outrage that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) still refuses to pull the abortion pill RU-486 from the market even after announcing today that two more women who took the drug have died.

“The FDA has pulled other drugs that have caused fewer deaths and less severe complications than RU-486. Why the double-standard for an abortion drug that is now linked to the deaths of seven healthy women and over 800 other reported complications?” stated Wendy Wright, president of CWA.

The FDA admits that only 10 percent of complications suffered by patients from drugs get reported. Over 800 complications due to RU-486 have been reported to the FDA.

“Two more families are grieving because the FDA refuses to pull this dangerous drug from the market,” said Wright. “By giving its approval, FDA participates in the deception that RU-486 is ‘safe.’ How many women must die before the FDA will act? Are their lives less important than making abortion convenient?”

Drugs with fewer reported complications that the FDA has pulled include:

NeutroSpec, an imaging agent used to diagnose internal infections, was pulled from the market after being linked to two deaths, 20 severe reactions, and 46 other “less” severe reactions.

Tysabri, a drug to treat multiple sclerosis, was pulled from the market on Feb. 28, 2005, after reports that three patients taking it had developed PML, a rare brain disease. Studies published in New England Journal of Medicine in early March reported no additional cases of PML.

Lotronex, the only drug in its class to treat irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), which afflicts approximately 40 million Americans was pulled. About 300,000 people had taken it. About 70 patients had developed severe problems, with five deaths including three possibly linked to the drug.

Bextra was pulled even though an FDA advisory committee voted a few months before that Bextra should remain on the market.

“The FDA has acted cautiously with these other drugs,” stated Miss Wright. “Why is that same caution not exercised with a drug that only women use, and it’s only purpose is to abort a baby?”



Bookmark and Share

For Information Contact:
Demi Bardsley
(202) 255-2278
media.cwfa.org

Printer Friendly Version

Recent Articles
“Temporary” Ban on Abortion Funding Proves Need for Permanent Ban
“Eggsploitation” Documentary Reveals Secrets of Infertility Industry
It's Official: ObamaCare Covers Abortion
New! July 28 Project 535 Lobby Day
Obama Funds Vote on Abortion in Kenya — Is This How He’ll Fund Abortion in the U.S.?
Choose Life Plates Spread Message and Save Lives
Washington Times Op-Ed - WRIGHT & HAWKINS: FDA misleads women on new abortion drug
Bad Romance: Donald Berwick and the UK’s Health Care System
Rocking Summer for Life
Talking Points: Abortions in military installations in the United States and abroad

 

 
 

 

Concerned Women for America
1015 Fifteenth St. N.W., Suite 1100
Washington, D.C. 20005
Phone: (202) 488-7000
Fax: (202) 488-0806

Feedback / Questions? || Problem with this page? || Archives



 
    ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....