|
Judicial Appointments Talking Points: Sen. Leahy's Double-Standard on Judicial Qualifications 1/30/2003 By Thomas L., Jipping, J.D. Two men with nearly identical records, and yet, 531 days separates them. ... On January 30, 2003, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted 10-9 to approve the nomination of Miguel Estrada to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. On January 24, 2003, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont) questioned Mr. Estrada's qualifications, saying he "has no judicial experience. He has no publications since his law school note. He is not a distinguished legal scholar or professor of law."
In 1997, Sen. Leahy praised Merrick Garland, another D.C. Circuit nominee with no judicial or professorial experience and no publications, as "highly qualified for this appointment" and someone who would make "an outstanding Federal judge." (Congressional Record, 3/19/97, at S2518).
Mr. Estrada's and Mr. Garland's credentials are exactly the same.
Credentials
|
Miguel Estrada
|
Merrick Garland
|
Age at nomination
|
41
|
44
|
Phi Beta Kappa
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Harvard Law School, magna cum laude
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Editor, Harvard Law Review
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Law Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Law Clerk, U.S. Supreme Court
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Private practice
|
7 years
|
7 years
|
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
2 years
|
3 years
|
U.S. Department of Justice
|
1992-1997
|
1993-1997
|
Bipartisan support
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Race
|
Hispanic
|
White
|
Days from nomination to Judiciary Committee approval
|
631
|
100
|
Seven current Judiciary Committee Democrats served in the Senate in 1997. Every one voted for Mr. Garland and against Mr. Estrada. Every observation by Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Massachusetts) about Mr. Garland (Congressional Record, 3/19/97, at S2518) applies to Mr. Estrada:
No one can question [his] qualifications and fitness to serve on the D.C. Circuit. He is a respected lawyer, a former Supreme Court law clerk, a partner at a prestigious law firm, and … has served with distinction in the Department of Justice under both Republican and Democratic administrations. Support for him is bipartisan.
 | Printer Friendly Version |