Search for on  
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
     


Click here
 

New Jersey High Court Uproots Marriage     10/25/2006

CWA says “extreme” ruling is out of step with the law and the people

Washington, D.C. − Concerned Women for America (CWA) criticized the New Jersey Supreme Court today for finding a so-called “right” to same-sex marriage in the state constitution, a ruling that CWA’s Chief Counsel Jan LaRue says “essentially mirrors what the Vermont Supreme Court did in 1999.”

In today’s 4-3 decision, the Garden State’s highest court went against two lower courts and the will of the people by siding with seven homosexual couples who were refused marriage licenses and alleged that this violated the New Jersey state constitution. By ruling in favor of these couples, the court ruled against preserving the most fundamental institution in our society: one-man, one-woman marriage.

"This is a textbook example of agenda-driven judges who are willing to twist their state laws and invade the province of the legislative branch in order to force same-sex 'marriage' on the people of New Jersey," LaRue said. “The court snubbed its nose at 28 separate statute sections that include a specific reference to either the term 'married woman' and a 'married man' or to the term 'husband and wife.' Because New Jersey has no residency requirement for marriage, if the legislature caves in to the court, it could open the door for lawsuits challenging every state’s marriage law."

“New Jersey has now given citizens greater reason to vote on November 7 to protect marriage in the 8 states with referendums on the ballot,” said Wendy Wright, CWA’s President. “The New Jersey Supreme Court has distinguished itself once again for imposing its own form of discrimination by arrogantly declaring that a woman is not needed to make a marriage, or that a man is not.

“The thirty-year experiment of treating marriage as expendable, by making divorce easy and children fatherless, has proven to be a disaster for women, children and society. This should provide enough evidence for courts and legislators to quit abusing marriage by pretending it is less important or demanding than it is. It’s utter discrimination to claim a woman is unnecessary, or a man is unnecessary, to make a marriage. We should not be forced, or children subjected to, another social experiment with marriage simply to make individuals personally satisfied.”



Bookmark and Share

For Information Contact:
Demi Bardsley
(202) 488-7000, ext. 1020
media.cwfa.org

Printer Friendly Version

Recent Articles
Vacation Surprise: Men Allowed in Women’s Restrooms
Statement on D.C. Same-Sex 'Marriage'
A Pro-Life and Pro-Taxpayer Win in Sycamore Township, Ohio
CWA of Virginia Stands in the Gap for Lisa and Isabella Miller
Entering the Age of Elegance
Biased Judge on California’s Proposition 8 Marriage Case
CWA Applauds New Proof that Abstinence Works
Help a Family, Help a Child
What’s this I hear about a Challenge to Marriage in California? I Thought the People Had Voted
What’s this I hear about a Challenge to Marriage in California? I Thought the People Had Voted

 

 
 

 

Concerned Women for America
1015 Fifteenth St. N.W., Suite 1100
Washington, D.C. 20005
Phone: (202) 488-7000
Fax: (202) 488-0806

Feedback / Questions? || Problem with this page? || Archives



 
    ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....