Search for on  
Wednesday, July 09, 2008
     
 Home
 About CWA
 Join CWA
 Give/Donate
- Donate Now
- More Ways to Give
 Get Involved
- Federal
- State/Local
 Media Center
- CWA Experts
- Press Releases
- CWA In The News
- CWA Op/Eds
 Legislation
 Beverly LaHaye
 Institute
 Culture and Family Issues
 Legal Studies
 Family Voice
 Multimedia
 Shop CWA
 About CWA
 CWALAC
 Project 535
 Employment
 Internships
 Brochures
 Recently on CWA
 Links

 

Supreme Court Hears Pornography Case During White Ribbons Against Pornography Week (WRAP)     10/30/2007

Washington, D.C. – The Supreme Court will hear arguments today in U.S. v. Williams involving the distribution and solicitation of illegal child pornography. In this case a man was charged under a federal statute after advertising on a chat-room: “Dad of toddler has ‘good pics’ of her and me for swap of your toddler pics, or live cam,” and then sending images of nude minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct to a federal agent.

Michael Williams pleaded guilty under a federal law that prohibits knowingly advertising, promoting, presenting, distributing, or soliciting any material in a manner that reflects the belief, or that is intended to cause another to believe, that the material is illegal child pornography. The Supreme Court is charged with determining if this law is overly broad and impermissibly vague, and thus unconstitutional.

Mario Diaz, Concerned Women for America’s (CWA) Policy Director for Legal Issues, says the answer is: no. “This law requires a specific intent on the part of the individual. It requires that he knowingly distribute or solicit illegal child pornography, or for him to cause another to believe the material is illegal child pornography, material that is clearly not protected speech under the First Amendment.”

CWA President Wendy Wright says she hopes the Supreme Court will go beyond mere theory and takes a closer look at the enormous effect pornography has on our society. “The facts of this case highlight for us the need for laws against obscene material and the importance of the strict enforcement of those laws. The First Amendment protects the intelligent exchange of ideas. It offers no protection for a parent to offer lascivious pictures of his toddler being sexually abused.

“It is only fitting that the Supreme Court is hearing this case right in the middle of White Ribbons Against Pornography (WRAP) Week when we are trying to raise awareness of the harmful effects of pornography. We hope that in looking at this case, the Justices keep in mind who is it that we are really trying to protect: the victims, not the criminals.”

For Information Contact:
Natalie Bell
(202) 488-7000
media.cwfa.org

Printer Friendly Version

Recent Articles
Judge Alex Kozinski Must Resign
Update on Online Safety Legislation
Hyatt Regency Chicago Hosts Perversion
Wendy Wright on CNN &CBN!
Family Advocates Call for Enforcement of Federal Obscenity Laws
Supreme Court Upholds Law Against Child Porn
Press Conference Against Pornography
“It’s Obscene!”
Wikipedia Peddles Porn to Kids
CWA of Illinois Supports HB 1727 – Library Internet Filters

 

 
 

 

Concerned Women for America
1015 Fifteenth St. N.W., Suite 1100
Washington, D.C. 20005
Phone: (202) 488-7000
Fax: (202) 488-0806

Feedback / Questions? || Problem with this page? || Archives



 
    ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....