Search for on  
Thursday, January 08, 2009
     
 Home
 About CWA
 Join CWA
 Give/Donate
- Donate Now
- More Ways to Give
 Get Involved
- Federal
- State/Local
 Media Center
 Legislation
 Beverly LaHaye
 Institute
 Culture and Family Issues
 Legal Studies
 Family Voice
- Subscribe Online!
 Multimedia
 Shop CWA
 About CWA
 CWALAC
 Project 535
 Employment
 Internships
 Brochures
 Fact Cards
 Recently on CWA
 Links

 

California Homeschooling Parents Treated as Criminals     3/7/2008

Homeschooling parents in California could be facing criminal sanctions if the ruling on In Re Rachel L. in the Court of Appeals in California stands. The Court determined that parents who homeschool their children without a valid state teaching credential "may be subject to a criminal complaint against them. …"

The ruling reversed a superior court's decision that found that "parents have a constitutional right to school their children in their own home."

California law requires children to be enrolled in public full-time day school unless they are enrolled in private school, the child is tutored by a person holding a valid state teaching credential, or some other exemption applies.

Homeschool parents in California comply with state law by enrolling their children in private schools that offer an independent study program that can be taken at home. This practice has been recognized by the California Department of Education and has not presented a problem until now. In this case, the children were enrolled in Sunland Christian School, a private school in full compliance of state law, but the Court called it a "ruse."

This seems unconscionable when estimates are that almost 200,000 children are educated at home in California. The Court's suggestion that they should all be subject to criminal sanctions would be comical, if it weren't so serious.

Moreover, the Court seemed to bypass the Supreme Court's long history of protecting a parent's right to direct the education of their children.1

That right, of course, does not give parents a right to abuse their children, and the sad part about this case is that parental abuse was alleged. Wherever there is abuse, children should always be protected, even from a parent. But that is a bad reflection on parenting, not on homeschooling.

Though the Court may have been trying to do the right thing for the children involved in this specific case, it should not have made such a broad ruling. On top of that, the Court asked for the opinion to be published, which means that it can be used to attack other homeschooling parents.

The Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA) has drafted a petition to request the "depublishing" of the decision, so that it cannot be use to harass homeschool families until the appellate process takes its course.

The decision is currently being appealed to the State Supreme Court.


End Notes
  1. Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923); Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972).

Printer Friendly Version

Recent Articles
The Fairness Doctrine Revival
eHarmony Forced to Provide Same-Sex Matching
Christians Under Attack: Same-Sex “Marriage” in California
Capitol Visitor Center Ignores Faith
Where Did Our Freedom Go?
Iranian Tyrant Honored by Left Wing Churches
Conscience Rights for Medical Professionals Issue Reaches the White House
California Supreme Court Strikes Religious Freedom for Doctors
China "Lip-Synching" Human Rights
California Court Reverses its Own Decision on Home Schooling

 

 
 

 

Concerned Women for America
1015 Fifteenth St. N.W., Suite 1100
Washington, D.C. 20005
Phone: (202) 488-7000
Fax: (202) 488-0806

Feedback / Questions? || Problem with this page? || Archives



 
    ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....