Proposition 8 Oral Arguments: Two Perspectives      3/13/2009

Click for more multimedia content.

Last week the California Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the validity of Proposition 8, passed by California voters last November. At issue before the justices was the validity of the voter-initiated vehicle for changing the state's Constitution as well as how the court should treat the more than 18-thousand homosexual couples that were "married" last summer before Proposition 8 took affect. We provide you with two views of this event from those inside the courtroom that day.

First, Brad Dacus, President of the Pacific Justice Institute, shares his perspective as a key legal voice for traditional marriage as well as the protection of those now facing harassment for their participation with the passage of Proposition 8. Listen | Download

Second, we spoke with Stacy Harp, New Media Specialist with Active Christian Media. Stacy relates her experiences both inside and outside the court as she shared highlights of the day and her observations via the new communications media Twitter and Facebook, along with her blog. Stacy is also among the countless California residents who have had their personal information published for the purpose of retaliation by homosexual activists, simply because she took an active roll in the passage of Proposition 8. Listen | Download

Printer Friendly Version

Recent Articles

The Vote is In: Maine Protects Marriage

Victory for Marriage in Maine!

53 Republicans Call for President to Fire Safe Schools Czar

Reject Referendum 71

Conservative Action Project: The Top Ten Reasons the Baucus Health Care Plan is Bad for America

The Price to Pay

Obama to Address Nation's Largest Homosexual Activist Group

Hawaii State Senator Reprimanded for Opposing Homosexual Unions

Hawaii State Senator Reprimanded for Opposing Homosexual Unions

Nadler Introduces Bill to Repeal DOMA and Undermine Marriage