Search for on  
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
     


Click here
 

Sotomayor Would Reject Herself for Supreme Court     7/14/2009
“Confirmation conversion” spotlights the contrast between past opinions and opening testimony

Washington, D.C. — Day one of Judge Sonia Sotomayor’s nomination hearing raised eyebrows when her opening statement contrasted with her well-known past opinions.

Sotomayor before the hearings: Sotomayor’s opening statement:

Race, gender, and ethnicity “may and will make a difference in our judging.” “In the past month, many Senators have asked me about my judicial philosophy. It is simple: fidelity to the law.”

The “court of appeals is where policy is made.” “The task of a judge is not to make the law — it is to apply the law.”

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.” “My personal and professional experiences help me listen and understand, with the law always commanding the result in every case.”

Discriminated and ruled against New Haven firefighters in Ricci because of the color of their skin. “Throughout my seventeen years on the bench, I have witnessed the human consequences of my decisions. Those decisions have been made not to serve the interests of any one litigant, but always to serve the larger interest of impartial justice.”

Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee (CWALAC) President Wendy Wright said, “Sotomayor’s new ‘enlightenment’ highlights the radicalism of her previous statements. She suddenly seems to know the proper role of a judge. Yet she purposely violated that responsibility to advance her ideology when the Supreme Court was not in sight.”

Mario Diaz, Esq., CWALAC’s Policy Director for Legal Issues, said, “Judge Sotomayor knew then, and recognizes now, what we have said all along, that a judge is to follow the law regardless of race and gender. Her opening statement at the hearings not only condemned her own record, it made all those senators we heard defending these unconstitutional statements look foolish.

“If Judge Sotomayor was to follow her new-found wisdom, she could not even support herself based on her record.”

Bookmark and Share

For Information Contact:
Demi Bardsley
(202) 488-7000, ext. 1020
media.cwfa.org

Printer Friendly Version

Recent Articles
One Nation Under Radical Rulers
Springtime in America
The Conservative Action Project: Dawn Johnsen Unsuitable for Crucial Legal Position at Department of Justice
Have You Heard of the Fort Jackson Five?
Homosexuals in the Military Press Conferenece
Special Commentary!  Missionary Zeal, Practical Wisdom and Haitian Orphans
Lifting the Ban on Homosexuals in the Military; a Commander's Perspective
Does Brown’s Victory Mean Trouble for Obama’s Agenda ... and his Future?
First Year Report Card for Barack Obama: Student needs to Repeat Grade
A Bill No Senator Can Be Proud Of

 

 
 

 

Concerned Women for America
1015 Fifteenth St. N.W., Suite 1100
Washington, D.C. 20005
Phone: (202) 488-7000
Fax: (202) 488-0806

Feedback / Questions? || Problem with this page? || Archives



 
    ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....