Search for on  
Sunday, November 08, 2009
     
 Home
 About CWA
 Join CWA
 Give/Donate
- Donate Now
- More Ways to Give
 Get Involved
- Federal
- State/Local
 Media Center
 Legislation
 Beverly LaHaye
 Institute
 Culture and Family Issues
 Legal Studies
 Family Voice
- Subscribe Online!
 Multimedia
 Shop CWA
 About CWA
 CWALAC
 Project 535
 Employment
 Internships
 Brochures
 Fact Cards
 Recently on CWA
 Links

CWA of Iowa – Veterans Event
November 9, 2009
Des Moines, IA

CWA of Hawaii – Now is the Time – Now More Than Ever
November 9, 2009
Hilo, HI

CWA of Central California – Beyond the TEA Parties
November 14, 2009
San Jose, CA

CWA of Iowa – National Day of Fasting, Repentance & Prayer
November 19, 2009
State Wide


 

Radicals Lobby U.N. for ‘Sexual Freedom,’ Even for Youth     7/1/2005
By Lindsey Douthit

They are willing to sacrifice any youthful innocence.

Adolescent girls walking into clinics and getting contraception. Little boys encouraged to “explore their sexuality.” Abortions on demand for those barely old enough to conceive. Sound crazy? Not to certain radical groups, as was made clear at the United Nations recently.

The June 24-25 “informal interactive hearings” between the U.N. General Assembly and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), civil society and the private sector, held in New York City, became a forum for various issues relevant to the liberal agenda. Radical groups such as Women’s Environment and Development Organization, International Planned Parenthood and MADRE (an “international women’s human rights organization”) used their statuses as active speakers to lobby for universal "reproductive freedom" and homosexual rights. One aspect of their demands was the right of young people to enjoy unlimited sexual freedom.

In a disturbing twist, radical groups often shifted the focus of reproductive freedom to youth. “We recommend all aspects of reproductive rights for adolescents,” declared Djeneba Diallo, representing Family Care International of Burkina Faso. Her sentiments were echoed by representatives from other groups such as Action Health Incorporated and National Youth Network for Reproductive Rights in Ecuador. They all stated the same thing: The concept of universal "reproductive rights" has no age limit.

According to speakers such as Diallo, the U.N. should not only adopt language to extend "sexual and reproductive rights" to young people, it should also raise awareness and funding for such “rights.” Youth should be included in all development goals, they argued, including those advocating “sexual freedom.” In the minds of radical activists, adolescents should have the right to decide when to begin having sex, obtain contraception at any time, and decide if and when to have abortions. Their sexuality should be gratified whenever they choose.

What radical groups do not include in their outlandish demands are the horrifying consequences of unlimited sexual freedom. The United States witnessed the ugliness of “sexual liberation” during the 1960s, when the ideology of “free love” permeated American culture. Since then, the number of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) has more than tripled. In terms of impact on youth, studies show that sexually active adolescents have increasing rates of STD contraction and are more prone to depression, suicidal tendencies, alcoholism, and drug abuse. The idea of “sexual freedom,” so enthusiastically touted by radical groups, actually shadows a dark reality of lifelong disease, emotional bondage and even death.

Also beyond the surface notion of allowing children access to contraception and abortion is the issue of suppressed parental rights. Parents would not have the right to know about their children’s sexual activity, as there would be no requirement of parental notification regarding contraception usage or abortion. According to groups like Family Care International, adolescents have as much right to sexual liberation as adults do, and parents should not have jurisdiction in the matter.

The promotion of "sexual and reproductive rights" for adolescents reflects the strategy of radical organizations to continue pushing the envelope toward uninhibited “sexual freedom” for all. In order to achieve this “liberation,” any standards regulating sexual behavior must be eradicated, including those for young people. Thus, through the United Nations, radical groups would further their efforts to open the door for sexual anarchy. Sadly, they are willing to sacrifice any remnants of youthful innocence in the process.

Lindsey Douthit is a recent graduate of Baylor University and a Ronald Reagan Memorial Intern with CWA. Thanks to the generosity of CWA donors, she was able to attend the hearings and allow CWA to monitor and communicate the reality of bias at the United Nations.



Bookmark and Share

Printer Friendly Version

Recent Articles
Iowa Holds 3rd Annual Event to Honor Veterans
MEMO FOR THE MOVEMENT: Women Reject Government Takeover of Healthcare System
Democrats are Dying to Kill Us
Conservative Leaders call on President Obama to end “Management by Malaise” approach to economy
Dumbing Down the Nobel Peace Prize
Conservative Action Project: Rangel & Pelosi: the Culture of Corruption Continues
CONSERVATIVE ACTION PROJECT: Democrat Congressional leaders undermine transparency and bipartisanship
Update From “The Hill” Health Care Amendments
Prayer: The Calm in the Storm of Politics
Does America Need Health Care Reform?

 

 
 

 

Concerned Women for America
1015 Fifteenth St. N.W., Suite 1100
Washington, D.C. 20005
Phone: (202) 488-7000
Fax: (202) 488-0806

Feedback / Questions? || Problem with this page? || Archives



 
    ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....