Search for on  
Sunday, March 21, 2010
     


Click here
 

     10/5/2005

The Filibuster

The 'Compromise'

Seven Republican Dwarves Sell-Out Snow White and Surrender the Key to the Castle
An extraordinarily bad deal leaves Democrats with ability to filibuster judicial nominees.

5/31/2005

Background

Pro-Family Leaders Predict Judicial Fight
(Family Voice)


The Constitutional Option
(One Page)

Why Not Go 24/7 on Judges?
The Committee for Justice


"Filibusters and Misleading Phrases"
by Gary Andres, The Washington Times

Then & Now

Then: The New York Times On The Filibuster, Circa 1995: "[It] Has Become The Tool Of The Sore Loser, Dooming Any Measure That Cannot Command The 60 Required Votes." (Editorial, "Time To Retire The Filibuster," The New York Times, January 1, 1995)

Now: The New York Times Calls Ending Unprecedented Filibusters Of Judicial Nominees "An Assault On Checks And Balances" And A "Power Grab." "The Senate majority leader, Bill Frist, wants Senate Democrats to accept a deal that would strip away their role in approving the most important federal judicial nominees. His proposal is an assault on checks and balances, and a power grab. Democrats should not go along." (Editorial, "A No-Compromise Compromise," The New York Times, May 3, 2005)

Resources

When Judges Are Out of Order:
Judicial Nominations and Your Rights

A gavel may be all that stands between you and the rights and liberties you cherish as an American

6/22/2005

Discarding ‘Embryonic’ Judges
A new day for the judicial confirmation process.

6/2/2005

Why the Constitutional Option is Now the Only Option
5/16/2005

Every American Has a Stake in Judicial Confirmations
5/13/2005

What if They Filibustered American Idol?
5/12/2005

Press Releases

CWA Tells Democrats: Drive-by Distortion and Deception are Not Debate
5/18/2005

CWA Says, It's Time to Tell Democrats 'Hit the Road, Jack'
5/16/2005

CWA Says, Politics, Sexism and Racism Behind Phony Filibusters
5/11/2005

Leaked Memos Reveal Democrats’ Strategy for Judges
5/11/2005

CWA Says, 'We're Not Wild About Harry'
5/10/2005

CWA Says Judicial-Busters Behave Like Neighborhood Bully
5/2/2005


-Back to Courts Page-



Bookmark and Share

Printer Friendly Version

Recent Articles
Biased Judge on California’s Proposition 8 Marriage Case
Like a Blind Man in the Watch Tower
Just a Thought: Liberal Judicial Activist Set for a Vote
Back to Plan A: The Courts
Coalition Letter in Opposition to the Nomination of Judge David Hamilton
Obama Names His First Judicial Nominee
Obama’s First Judicial Nominee: Another Slap in the Face of Christian Conservatives
Consider Judges When You Vote in November
Justice and Fairness Dead in Judicial Confirmation Process
Judging a Judge

 

 
 

 

Concerned Women for America
1015 Fifteenth St. N.W., Suite 1100
Washington, D.C. 20005
Phone: (202) 488-7000
Fax: (202) 488-0806

Feedback / Questions? || Problem with this page? || Archives



 
    ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....