Search for on  
Saturday, November 07, 2009
     
 Home
 About CWA
 Join CWA
 Give/Donate
- Donate Now
- More Ways to Give
 Get Involved
- Federal
- State/Local
 Media Center
 Legislation
 Beverly LaHaye
 Institute
 Culture and Family Issues
 Legal Studies
 Family Voice
- Subscribe Online!
 Multimedia
 Shop CWA
 About CWA
 CWALAC
 Project 535
 Employment
 Internships
 Brochures
 Fact Cards
 Recently on CWA
 Links

CWA of Iowa – Veterans Event
November 9, 2009
Des Moines, IA

CWA of Hawaii – Now is the Time – Now More Than Ever
November 9, 2009
Hilo, HI

CWA of Central California – Beyond the TEA Parties
November 14, 2009
San Jose, CA

CWA of Iowa – National Day of Fasting, Repentance & Prayer
November 19, 2009
State Wide


 

     10/5/2005

The Filibuster

The 'Compromise'

Seven Republican Dwarves Sell-Out Snow White and Surrender the Key to the Castle
An extraordinarily bad deal leaves Democrats with ability to filibuster judicial nominees.

5/31/2005

Background

Pro-Family Leaders Predict Judicial Fight
(Family Voice)


The Constitutional Option
(One Page)

Why Not Go 24/7 on Judges?
The Committee for Justice


"Filibusters and Misleading Phrases"
by Gary Andres, The Washington Times

Then & Now

Then: The New York Times On The Filibuster, Circa 1995: "[It] Has Become The Tool Of The Sore Loser, Dooming Any Measure That Cannot Command The 60 Required Votes." (Editorial, "Time To Retire The Filibuster," The New York Times, January 1, 1995)

Now: The New York Times Calls Ending Unprecedented Filibusters Of Judicial Nominees "An Assault On Checks And Balances" And A "Power Grab." "The Senate majority leader, Bill Frist, wants Senate Democrats to accept a deal that would strip away their role in approving the most important federal judicial nominees. His proposal is an assault on checks and balances, and a power grab. Democrats should not go along." (Editorial, "A No-Compromise Compromise," The New York Times, May 3, 2005)

Resources

When Judges Are Out of Order:
Judicial Nominations and Your Rights

A gavel may be all that stands between you and the rights and liberties you cherish as an American

6/22/2005

Discarding ‘Embryonic’ Judges
A new day for the judicial confirmation process.

6/2/2005

Why the Constitutional Option is Now the Only Option
5/16/2005

Every American Has a Stake in Judicial Confirmations
5/13/2005

What if They Filibustered American Idol?
5/12/2005

Press Releases

CWA Tells Democrats: Drive-by Distortion and Deception are Not Debate
5/18/2005

CWA Says, It's Time to Tell Democrats 'Hit the Road, Jack'
5/16/2005

CWA Says, Politics, Sexism and Racism Behind Phony Filibusters
5/11/2005

Leaked Memos Reveal Democrats’ Strategy for Judges
5/11/2005

CWA Says, 'We're Not Wild About Harry'
5/10/2005

CWA Says Judicial-Busters Behave Like Neighborhood Bully
5/2/2005


-Back to Courts Page-



Bookmark and Share

Printer Friendly Version

Recent Articles
Back to Plan A: The Courts
Coalition Letter in Opposition to the Nomination of Judge David Hamilton
Obama Names His First Judicial Nominee
Obama’s First Judicial Nominee: Another Slap in the Face of Christian Conservatives
Consider Judges When You Vote in November
Justice and Fairness Dead in Judicial Confirmation Process
Judging a Judge
Press Conference in Support of Judge Conrad
Obstruction of Judicial Nominees Continues
E-Alert: Tell Everyone You Know About the Obstruction of Circuit Court Judicial Nominees

 

 
 

 

Concerned Women for America
1015 Fifteenth St. N.W., Suite 1100
Washington, D.C. 20005
Phone: (202) 488-7000
Fax: (202) 488-0806

Feedback / Questions? || Problem with this page? || Archives



 
    ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....