Search for on  
Thursday, January 08, 2009
     
 Home
 About CWA
 Join CWA
 Give/Donate
- Donate Now
- More Ways to Give
 Get Involved
- Federal
- State/Local
 Media Center
- CWA Experts
- Press Releases
- CWA In The News
- CWA Op/Eds
 Legislation
 Beverly LaHaye
 Institute
 Culture and Family Issues
 Legal Studies
 Family Voice
- Subscribe Online!
 Multimedia
 Shop CWA
 About CWA
 CWALAC
 Project 535
 Employment
 Internships
 Brochures
 Fact Cards
 Recently on CWA
 Links

 

CWA on Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood: Abortionists Are No Substitute for Parents      11/28/2005

Washington, D.C.—Concerned Women for America (CWA) gives its wholehearted support to New Hampshire’s parental notification law being challenged in the U.S. Supreme Court this Wednesday. CWA joined in an amicus brief by Christian Legal Society explaining that Planned Parenthood’s arguments against the law are without medical merit, and the best medical interest of minors is served by their parent’s involvement in this life-changing decision.

“New Hampshire’s parental notification law would save teenagers from having to face a life-altering decision in secret, separated from their parents by abortionists who profit only if they choose to end their child’s life,” said Wendy Wright, CWA’s executive vice president.

“Parental notification and consent laws are wildly popular with Americans, with polls showing support at 70 to 80 percent. Parents have their daughter’s best interest at heart, know her medical history and are critical for follow-up care, especially when a girl suffers complications from an abortion.”

The New Hampshire law is modeled after Minnesota’s, which has no health exception, was upheld as constitutional by the United States Supreme Court, and has been in effect for over 20 years with no reported health emergencies suffered by Minnesota teens. Similarly North Dakota, a state with the lowest teen pregnancy rate in the country, has had a parental-consent law with no health exception since 1981 with no reported harm to teens in that state.

“While abortionists claim that a medical emergency would require committing an abortion on a minor without her parent’s knowledge, none of the plaintiffs in this case claim to have ever treated a minor suffering from a medical condition that necessitated an emergency abortion,” said Wendy Wright. “And yet they convinced lower courts that the entire law must be thrown out on this specious claim. We expect that the Supreme Court will look at the medical evidence as well as the legal reasoning, will respect the role of parents in knowing and caring for their daughters, and uphold New Hampshire’s parental notification law.”

For Information Contact:
Valerie Mosher
(202) 488-7000
media.cwfa.org

Printer Friendly Version

Recent Articles
Announcing the 2009 Pro-Life Lobby Day on February 24
Obama Faces Pro-Life Opposition During Inauguration Week
HHS Issues Rule Protecting Rights of Choice and Conscience
Frozen Embryo Adoptions are Heating Up
Defunding Planned Parenthood in Kansas
Family Voice: Christmas 2008
HHS Rule Protects Patients’ Ability to Access Doctors of their Choice
Planned Parenthood Caught Again
New Gift Idea for Christmas 2008: Planned Parenthood of Indiana Offers Death by Gift Certificate
Abortion Advocates Emboldened by Obama Win

 

 
 

 

Concerned Women for America
1015 Fifteenth St. N.W., Suite 1100
Washington, D.C. 20005
Phone: (202) 488-7000
Fax: (202) 488-0806

Feedback / Questions? || Problem with this page? || Archives



 
    ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....