Search for on  
Thursday, December 04, 2008
     
 Home
 About CWA
 Join CWA
 Give/Donate
- Donate Now
- More Ways to Give
 Get Involved
- Federal
- State/Local
 Media Center
 Legislation
 Beverly LaHaye
 Institute
 Culture and Family Issues
 Legal Studies
 Family Voice
- Subscribe Online!
 Multimedia
 Shop CWA
 About CWA
 CWALAC
 Project 535
 Employment
 Internships
 Brochures
 Fact Sheets
 Recently on CWA
 Links

 

Thumbs Down to Kennedy     1/13/2006
By Jan LaRue, Chief Counsel

“The words of the wicked lie in wait for blood, but the speech of the upright rescues them.”—Proverbs 12:6

At the end of Day 1 of the Senate committee hearing for Judge Samuel Alito, critics said the liberals on the Senate panel hadn’t shown any heart for the battle. They weren’t hurting Alito. When they did ask penetrating, relevant questions on appropriate subjects, they didn’t score.

The crowd of liberals and special-interest groups screamed for blood.

Most of us learned as kids that bullies never fight fair—it’s what makes them cowards. They love the smell of blood unless it’s their own. They rarely learn from reason or the Socratic Method. It usually takes a solid right hook to the nose.

I once slugged a fifth-grade classmate who was punching some kindergarten kids during recess. There weren’t any teachers around and nobody else did anything to stop it. At an eighth-grade picnic, the same bully poured Pepsi on girls seated on the ground. He approached me, apparently suffering a memory lapse, so I tried reason and refreshed his recollection. He raised the bottle, so I busted his nose. He brought me a giant-sized Hershey bar every day through graduation and wanted me to date him in high school, his nose scar notwithstanding.

I hate violence—real or fake. But I confess there were times during the hearing when I wanted to bust some noses, starting with Ted Kennedy¯minority bully and coward from Massachusetts.

On Day 2, Kennedy and his “respected” gladiators went after Alito, knowing he would lose unless he took whatever they gave without responding in kind.

What followed was stomach-churning blood sport. By comparison, Roman gladiators seemed civilized. They were equally armed and fought valiantly or were put to death.

This was about nothing more than political survival.

Under the banner of a blood-soaked abortion lobby, Kennedy and company stripped the soft-spoken, intellectual gladiator of sword and shield, chained him to a post, and flailed away in the name of human rights.

Alito dare not get his back up. He had to maintain that temperate judicial manner while snarling, condescending bullies sliced away.

The self-styled savior of women, who deserted a woman when she needed him most, led the attack. Don’t call it a cheap-shot about ancient history, not after he assailed Alito about a 30-year-old insignificant association.

Passing judgment on another’s integrity ought to require at least a negligible amount of it. Many of Kennedy’s under-40 fan club wouldn’t know Chappaquiddick from lip balm.

They went for the jugular of Alito’s character and reputation with “reckless words [that] pierce like a sword.” The browbeaters knew in their puny hearts their words were baseless and ruthless. But they went for the man in front of his wife, daughter, son, sister, friends, colleagues and a global TV audience that included his mother. And they did so while protesting torture and unjust confinement.

The government bullies ravaged Alito for “siding with government against the little guy.” They stripped his armor to fire at the modern-day “Machine-gun Kelly.”

Kennedy, who cavorted among the all-male Hasty Pudding-heads at Harvard, pummeled Alito for association with the allegedly “racist … sexist … and homophobic” Concerned Alumni of Princeton. Even Kennedy’s fan club at The New York Times had cleared Alito several weeks prior.

Kennedy either knew that and ignored it or he’s more reckless about truth than any imagined. A bully with numerous ethical lapses railed against Alito’s unimpeached record.

At the end of Day 2, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) had enough of the charges of bigotry and all the rest. His voice trembled and tears appeared as he began an apology to Judge Alito and his family for what they had endured. Mrs. Alito responded with tears of appreciation and pride for the man at the post.

So did most of us. It made me want even more to bust a nose.

Judge Alito should receive a unanimous thumbs-up. Nobody could survive the post with more class and honor.

Kennedy, on the other hand, should depart an arena he has dishonored beyond recovery. Liberal stomachs must have churned as well.

There aren’t enough Hershey bars in the whole world to cover this one.

Printer Friendly Version

Recent Articles
Supreme Court Year in Review 2007-2008
Supreme Court Back in Session
Protect Children, Not Charlatans
Constitutional Blunder
Enormous Implications in Medellín Supreme Court Case
Alarming: The Dissent's Opinion in Gonzales v. Carhart
CWA President Wendy Wright Reacts to the Court’s PBA Decision
O'Connor Connects Court Critics to Cookie Caper
A Brief Look at the Arguments in Gonzales v. Carhart
A Brief Look at the Arguments in Gonzales v. Carhart

 

 
 

 

Concerned Women for America
1015 Fifteenth St. N.W., Suite 1100
Washington, D.C. 20005
Phone: (202) 488-7000
Fax: (202) 488-0806

Feedback / Questions? || Problem with this page? || Archives



 
    ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....