Search for on  
Tuesday, February 09, 2010
     
 Home
 About CWA
 Join CWA
 Give/Donate
- Donate Now
- More Ways to Give
 Get Involved
- Federal
- State/Local
 Media Center
- CWA Experts
- Press Releases
- CWA In The News
- CWA Op/Eds
 Legislation
 Beverly LaHaye
 Institute
 Culture and Family Issues
 Legal Studies
 Family Voice
- Subscribe Online!
 Multimedia
 Shop CWA
 CWALAC
 Project 535
 Employment
 Internships
 Brochures
 Fact Cards
 Recently on CWA
 Links


Click here
 

CWA Holds Out Hope for Terri after Supreme Court Rejection      3/24/2005

Washington, D.C. – Concerned Women for America (CWA) denounced the U.S. Supreme Court’s rejection of the Schindler family’s appeal to reinsert Terri Schiavo’s feeding tube so that the Court can then review whether her constitutional and statutory rights have been violated.

“It’s tragic that the Supreme Court’s ‘evolving standards of decency’ haven’t evolved enough to protect Terri Schiavo,” said Jan LaRue, CWA’s chief counsel. “You’d think that a Court that prohibits states from executing retarded, convicted murderers would prohibit the state ordered death of an innocent woman when there’s so little evidence of her wishes. You couldn’t establish probable cause for a search warrant based on the stale and highly suspect hearsay statements in this case. How could any court find it clear and convincing evidence sufficient to order a woman’s death by starvation? If this satisfies constitutional due process, God help us.”

“While this case has been in many courts, it has only been fully examined by one judge who consistently rules against anyone except Terri’s adulterous husband,” said Wendy Wright, CWA’s senior policy director. “That is why Congress and the President went to such lengths to pass Terri’s Law – to get a full review of the facts. But the federal courts have shunned this duty and by doing so sentenced an innocent woman to die based on suspicious and contended claims. We hope that Gov. Bush will do everything in his power to protect Terri from a merciless judiciary.”

“In 1984, the New Hampshire Supreme Court upheld a trial court order that authorized a prison warden to feed and nourish a prison inmate over his objection, even though he was mentally competent and wanted to die by starvation. Here we have a judge ordering the removal of food and water to cause starvation. Even if we knew that’s what Terri wanted, Florida law makes aiding and abetting a suicide a felony, and there’s no black-robed exemption,” said LaRue.



Bookmark and Share

For Information Contact:
Demi Bardsley
(202) 488-7000, ext. 1020
media.cwfa.org

Printer Friendly Version

Recent Articles
CWA Calls Out NOW for its Bizarre Attack on Super Bowl Ad
The Aftermath of Abortion
There Was a Heartbeat
March For Life, Abortion in Obamacare, Tiller Murder Trial
Abortion and Recovery: Two Women's Stories
Bella Hero: A Powerful Movie Lives On
Congressman Trent Franks Remembering the Unborn on the 36th Anniversary of Roe vs. Wade
Abortion Changes You … and Those You Love

 

 
 

 

Concerned Women for America
1015 Fifteenth St. N.W., Suite 1100
Washington, D.C. 20005
Phone: (202) 488-7000
Fax: (202) 488-0806

Feedback / Questions? || Problem with this page? || Archives



 
    ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....