Search for on  
Saturday, July 04, 2009
     
 Home
 About CWA
 Join CWA
 Give/Donate
- Donate Now
- More Ways to Give
 Get Involved
- Federal
- State/Local
 Media Center
- CWA Experts
- Press Releases
- CWA In The News
- CWA Op/Eds
 Legislation
 Beverly LaHaye
 Institute
 Culture and Family Issues
 Legal Studies
 Family Voice
- Subscribe Online!
 Multimedia
 Shop CWA
 About CWA
 CWALAC
 Project 535
 Employment
 Internships
 Brochures
 Fact Cards
 Recently on CWA
 Links

CWA of VA - Now More Than Ever
October 15, 2009
Forest, VA


 

CWA: Marriage Needs Protection on All Fronts     2/24/2004

It’s not enough to protect only the word ‘marriage.'

Washington, D.C. – Concerned Women for America’s President Sandy Rios responded to President Bush’s announcement on marriage today, saying, “Concerned Women for America is grateful to President Bush for speaking out in favor of the integrity of marriage. But we regret that we cannot support the defective remedy he has chosen.

“A constitutional amendment defining marriage as a relationship between one man and one woman is a necessary safeguard against the current assault on the institution of marriage,” said Michael Schwartz, vice president for government relations for CWA. “But if that amendment authorizes state legislatures to confer the entire legal substance of marriage (without the name of marriage) upon persons who are not married, then it takes away with one hand what it gives with the other.”

"What makes anybody think that activist courts or renegade mayors will respect a state's choice to not provide marriage benefits to civil unions?” said Jan LaRue, CWA's chief counsel. “Any state law, including a state constitutional amendment, can be trumped by a federal equal protection ruling by an activist judge.”

A new study of Scandinavian nations, where the equivalent of gay marriage has been in place for several years has, “driven home the message that marriage itself is outdated, and that virtually any family form, including out-of-wedlock parenting, is acceptable,” according to the Hoover Institution’s Stanley Kurtz.

“It’s not enough to protect only the word ‘marriage,’” said Robert Knight, director of the Culture and Family Institute. “California has shown us what happens when marital benefits are conferred upon unmarried relationships, such as, ‘domestic partnerships.’ Business people, regardless of their beliefs, are now being forced to promote homosexuality or lose state contracts; schoolchildren are being taught that homosexuality is normal and healthy; the Boy Scouts are being driven from the public square. “

CWA will work with state legislatures to build legal safeguards for marriage and also work on Capitol Hill to strengthen the language of a federal constitutional amendment.



Bookmark and Share

For Information Contact:
Demi Bardsley
(202) 488-7000, ext. 134
media.cwfa.org

Printer Friendly Version

Recent Articles
Maine's Battle for Marriage
New Hampshire Battles to Save Marriage
Is Government-Run Healthcare Really More for Less?
CWALAC Letter Regarding the Hasting Amendment
Civil Rights Commission Opposes "Hate Crimes" Bill
A Look At Health Care Reform Legislation
Obama Spends Tax Dollars to Demean Marriage, Appease Homosexual Activists and Encourage Fraud
Proposition 8 Upheld By California Supreme Court
Challenging Corporate Promotion of Homosexuality
Mothers Day Under Attack?

 

 
 

 

Concerned Women for America
1015 Fifteenth St. N.W., Suite 1100
Washington, D.C. 20005
Phone: (202) 488-7000
Fax: (202) 488-0806

Feedback / Questions? || Problem with this page? || Archives



 
    ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....