Search for on  
Monday, December 01, 2008
     
 Home
 About CWA
 Join CWA
 Give/Donate
- Donate Now
- More Ways to Give
 Get Involved
- Federal
- State/Local
 Media Center
- CWA Experts
- Press Releases
- CWA In The News
- CWA Op/Eds
 Legislation
 Beverly LaHaye
 Institute
 Culture and Family Issues
 Legal Studies
 Family Voice
- Subscribe Online!
 Multimedia
 Shop CWA
 About CWA
 CWALAC
 Project 535
 Employment
 Internships
 Brochures
 Fact Sheets
 Recently on CWA
 Links

 

CWA Calls for Real Protection of Marriage     3/22/2004

We urge leaders on Capitol Hill to write an amendment that clearly defines marriage.

Washington, D.C. - Concerned Women for America (CWA) called on congressional leaders to strongly protect marriage in the Constitution, and said that proposed changes to the Federal Marriage Amendment (FMA) would more explicitly permit states to create civil unions.

“CWA continues to stand for protecting marriage without sanctioning bad behavior,” said Robert Knight, director of the Culture and Family Institute, an affiliate of CWA. “We urge leaders on Capitol Hill to write an amendment that clearly defines marriage. Even just the first sentence of the FMA is better standing alone. We could support that language because it would ‘do no harm.’”

“The FMA, as amended, still allows for the erosion of marriage by allowing states to create civil unions. Whether you call other relationships ‘Quasi Marital Schemes’ or ‘Civil Unions,’ when they're recognized in law no differently from marriage, all you've protected is the name.

“At least this clarifies whether the amendment is worded specifically to allow state legislatures to create counterfeit ‘marriage.’ And it does. The new language omits the words, ‘nor state or federal law,’ thereby limiting its application.”

The amendment now reads:

“Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman. Neither this Constitution, nor the constitution of any State, shall be construed to require that marriage or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon any union other than the union of a man and a woman.”

“It's wrong for government to sanction and benefit unmarried relationships, ‘gay’ or straight, whether it's done by a court or a legislature,” said Jan LaRue, CWA's chief counsel. “The change in the second sentence will raise more objections from the homosexual lobby because it permits courts to confer the ‘legal incidents of marriage’ on ‘the union of a man and a woman.’ That could be an unmarried couple. The former language barred courts from benefiting ‘unmarried couples or groups.’”

“When a state creates civil unions and domestic partnerships, it gives government approval to behavior that is immoral, unhealthy and destructive to individuals, families and communities,” said Knight. “It sends a message to children that marriage itself no longer matters.”

For Information Contact:
Valerie Mosher
(202) 488-7000
media.cwfa.org

Printer Friendly Version

Recent Articles
Guest Commentary! Hate Crimes Legislation: The Politically Correct Way to Silence People of Faith
Threats and Violence Across the Nation Following Votes for Traditional Marriage
Marriage Wins in Three More States
Homosexual Activists Turn Angry and Violent Over Marriage Votes
Support of Traditional Marriage Continues to Grow in California
German Officials Interfere in U.S. Election
The Tale of a Mother and her Daughter
Taxpayers Fund “Gay Wedding” Field Trip for First Graders
Connecticut High Court Imposes "Gay Marriage," Threatens Religious Liberty
U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Lisa Miller Case

 

 
 

 

Concerned Women for America
1015 Fifteenth St. N.W., Suite 1100
Washington, D.C. 20005
Phone: (202) 488-7000
Fax: (202) 488-0806

Feedback / Questions? || Problem with this page? || Archives



 
    ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....