Search for on  
Saturday, November 21, 2009
     
 Home
 About CWA
 Join CWA
 Give/Donate
- Donate Now
- More Ways to Give
 Get Involved
- Federal
- State/Local
 Media Center
 Legislation
 Beverly LaHaye
 Institute
 Culture and Family Issues
 Legal Studies
 Family Voice
- Subscribe Online!
 Multimedia
 Shop CWA
 About CWA
 CWALAC
 Project 535
 Employment
 Internships
 Brochures
 Fact Cards
 Recently on CWA
 Links

CWA of Central California – Beyond the TEA Parties
November 14, 2009
San Jose, CA

CWA of Iowa – National Day of Fasting, Repentance & Prayer
November 19, 2009
State Wide

CWA of North Dakota – National Day of Fasting, Repentance & Prayer
November 19, 2009
State Wide

CWA of Maine – National Day of Fasting, Repentance & Prayer
November 19, 2009
State Wide

CWA of Ohio – National Day of Fasting, Repentance & Prayer
November 19, 2009
State Wide

CWA of Virginia – National Day of Fasting, Repentance & Prayer
November 19, 2009
State Wide

CWA of South Dakota – National Day of Fasting, Repentance & Prayer
November 19, 2009
State Wide

CWA of Oklahoma – National Day of Fasting, Repentance & Prayer
November 19, 2009
State Wide

CWA of New Hampshire – National Day of Fasting, Repentance & Prayer
November 19, 2009
State Wide

CWA of Hawaii – National Day of Fasting, Repentance & Prayer
November 19, 2009
State Wide

CWA of Louisiana – National Day of Fasting, Repentance & Prayer
November 19, 2009
State Wide


 

When Judges Are Out of Order:
Judicial Nominations and Your Rights
     6/22/2005
By Jan LaRue, Chief Counsel

A gavel may be all that stands between you and the rights and liberties you cherish as an American.

"There is no liberty if the power of judging be not separated from the legislative and executive powers." The Federalist No. 78

  1. AMERICANS BELIEVE IN EQUAL PROTECTION FOR ALL AMERICANS: It was judges not legislators who ruled that African slaves were not citizens protected by the U.S. Constitution but were the property of their slave masters. Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856).
  2. AMERICANS ARE PROLIFE: It was judges not legislators who by an act of "raw judicial power" struck-down the abortion laws of the states and created a constitutional "right" to abortion. Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
  3. AMERICANS TREASURE RELIGIOUS LIBERTY: It was judges not legislators who ruled that a school district policy permitting student-led, student-initiated prayer prior to school football games violates the Constitution. Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe, 530 U.S. 290 (2000).
  4. AMERICANS ARE PATRIOTIC: It was judges not legislators who ruled that burning the American flag is "expressive conduct" protected by the First Amendment. Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989).
  5. AMERICANS BELIEVE IN MARRIAGE: It was judges not legislators who created a right of homosexual marriage. Goodridge v. Department of Health, 440 Mass. 309, 798 N.E.2d 941 (Mass. 2003).
  6. AMERICANS WANT CHILDREN PROTECTED FROM SEXUAL PREDATORS: It was judges not legislators who ruled that the First Amendment protects "virtual" child pornography. Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 122 S. Ct. 1389 (2002)
  7. AMERICANS BELIEVE IN PARENTAL RIGHTS: It was judges not legislators who ruled that minor girls may obtain an abortion without parental consent. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth, 428 U.S. 52 (1976).
  8. AMERICANS WANT GOD ACKNOWLEDGED IN PUBLIC LIFE: It was judges not legislators who ruled that a state law requiring the posting of the Ten Commandments in public school classrooms is unconstitutional. Stone v. Graham, 449 U.S. 39 (1980).
  9. AMERICANS SUPPORT LAWS THAT PROTECT MORALITY: It was judges not legislators who ruled that sodomy is a constitutional right. Lawrence v. Texas, 123 S. Ct. 2472 (2003).
  10. AMERICANS BELIEVE IN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL AMERICANS: It was judges not legislators who ruled that a university may use race as a factor in selecting students for admission. Grutter v. Bollinger, 123 S. Ct. 2325 (2003).

Judges, unlike legislators, are unelected and unaccountable to the people they represent. Who becomes a judge affects every area of your life. A gavel may be all that stands between you and the rights and liberties you cherish as an American.

Ultra left special interest groups are spending millions to make sure that only individuals who share their political agenda become federal judges. They want judges who write law rather than judges who interpret the laws that "We the People" write. Unless you actively participate in the judicial nominations process by making sure that the president and the U.S. senators know that you want federal judges who respect the Constitution, the rule of law and the limited role of a judge, the rights lost may be your own.

Bookmark and Share

Printer Friendly Version

Recent Articles
Like a Blind Man in the Watch Tower
Just a Thought: Liberal Judicial Activist Set for a Vote
Back to Plan A: The Courts
Coalition Letter in Opposition to the Nomination of Judge David Hamilton
Obama Names His First Judicial Nominee
Obama’s First Judicial Nominee: Another Slap in the Face of Christian Conservatives
Consider Judges When You Vote in November
Justice and Fairness Dead in Judicial Confirmation Process
Judging a Judge
Press Conference in Support of Judge Conrad

 

 
 

 

Concerned Women for America
1015 Fifteenth St. N.W., Suite 1100
Washington, D.C. 20005
Phone: (202) 488-7000
Fax: (202) 488-0806

Feedback / Questions? || Problem with this page? || Archives



 
    ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....