Search for on  
Sunday, November 08, 2009
     
 Home
 About CWA
 Join CWA
 Give/Donate
- Donate Now
- More Ways to Give
 Get Involved
- Federal
- State/Local
 Media Center
 Legislation
 Beverly LaHaye
 Institute
 Culture and Family Issues
- C&F Report Archives
- Papers
 Legal Studies
 Family Voice
- Subscribe Online!
 Multimedia
 Shop CWA
 About CWA
 CWALAC
 Project 535
 Employment
 Internships
 Brochures
 Fact Cards
 Recently on CWA
 Links

CWA of Iowa – Veterans Event
November 9, 2009
Des Moines, IA

CWA of Hawaii – Now is the Time – Now More Than Ever
November 9, 2009
Hilo, HI

CWA of Central California – Beyond the TEA Parties
November 14, 2009
San Jose, CA

CWA of Iowa – National Day of Fasting, Repentance & Prayer
November 19, 2009
State Wide


 

Liberals Introduce Bill Adding ‘Sexual Orientation’ to Federal Law     7/12/2005
By Robert Knight

Measure is response to Office of Special Counsel’s refusal to give homosexuality protected status.

Eleven pro-homosexual congressmen have introduced a bill that would add “sexual orientation” to the list of protected categories for federal employees.

The action comes during an aggressive liberal campaign against Scott Bloch, who heads the federal Office of Special Counsel (OSC), which handles cases involving the federal merit system.

The agency is empowered to prosecute federal managers who violate the rights of employees under the Civil Service Reform Act. This includes whistleblowers – employees who seek shelter for reporting wrongdoing in their agencies. One section of the law incorporates protection based on traditional civil-rights categories such as race, color, creed and religion. Another protects conduct outside the job.

During the Clinton administration, Special Counsel Elaine Kaplan, an out lesbian, incorporated “sexual orientation” under the “conduct unrelated to the job” portion, thus elevating homosexuality to a protected status even in the absence of any issue over conduct. Bloch last year removed the words “sexual orientation” from that portion of the OSC’s Web site, noting that Congress had never authorized the addition.

In recent testimony before a Senate panel, Bloch reiterated why he believes the law is clear, and that Congress’ listing of categories necessarily limits his jurisdiction.

In response, 11 congressmen, including openly homosexual Reps. Barney Frank (D-Massachusetts), Jim Kolbe (R-Arizona) and Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisconsin), have sponsored a bill, H.R. 3128, the Clarification of Federal Employment Protection Act. The chief sponsor is Rep. Henry Waxman (D-California), who represents West Hollywood, a homosexual enclave in Los Angeles County. Waxman is the ranking minority member of the House Government Reform Committee.

Other co-sponsors include Mark Foley (R-Florida), Christopher Shays (R-Connecticut), Danny Davis (D-New York), Eliot Engle (D-New York), Chris Van Hollen (D-Maryland), Steny Hoyer (D-Maryland), and Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-District of Columbia).

“Someone needs to tell these congressmen that creating a special civil-rights status for federal employees based on bedroom behavior is an insult to true minorities,” said Jan LaRue, Concerned Women for America’s (CWA’s) chief counsel. “Who’re next, adulterers? And why should federal employees have greater civil rights protection than ordinary, hard-working Americans?"

Bloch said in a May 24, 2005, hearing before the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Subcommittee that no law allows the creation of new categories of civil rights statutes, so that the OSC has no authority to go beyond what is listed. He noted that neither Congress nor any federal court has authorized civil rights “status” claims based on “sexual orientation.” He said that all employees, including homosexuals, would be protected from any discrimination based on a law protecting non-work “conduct” that does not interfere with their work, but that conduct and status are vastly different levels of protection in law.

When a media firestorm hit last year after the agency’s Web site dropped the term “sexual orientation,” and Democrats held a press conference calling for Bloch’s resignation, the Bush administration reacted defensively, indicating that they expected Bloch to relent. But Bloch insisted that he has no authority to prosecute cases based solely on mere “status.”

“We do not see sexual orientation as a term for class status anywhere in the statute or in the legislative history or case law, in fact, quite contrary to it,” Bloch told the Senate panel.

Take action: CWA urges pro-family Americans to oppose this bill. Call your U.S. representative and U.S. senators. Capitol switchboard: (202) 224-3121.



Bookmark and Share

Printer Friendly Version

Recent Articles
The Vote is In: Maine Protects Marriage
Victory for Marriage in Maine!
53 Republicans Call for President to Fire Safe Schools Czar
Reject Referendum 71
Conservative Action Project: The Top Ten Reasons the Baucus Health Care Plan is Bad for America
The Price to Pay
Obama to Address Nation's Largest Homosexual Activist Group
Hawaii State Senator Reprimanded for Opposing Homosexual Unions
Hawaii State Senator Reprimanded for Opposing Homosexual Unions
Nadler Introduces Bill to Repeal DOMA and Undermine Marriage

 

 
 

 

Concerned Women for America
1015 Fifteenth St. N.W., Suite 1100
Washington, D.C. 20005
Phone: (202) 488-7000
Fax: (202) 488-0806

Feedback / Questions? || Problem with this page? || Archives



 
    ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....