|
Should Raunchy Be the Fourth R? 8/18/2005 For many pupils, “back to school” means back to sexual propaganda. School is just around the corner. Awaiting anxious students are new schedules, new teachers, new challenges and in some school districts, old controversies about what books should be read in school. Wow, where did the summer go?
School districts have been facing decisions over what should be in the library as long as there have been libraries, but recent changes in the world of children's literature and our society have focused the debates on teen sexuality. A recent MSNBC article describes growing parental concern over the explicit nature of books aimed at young teens.
Correspondent Janet Shamlian reports on some recent hot selling teen titles:
“In Claiming Georgia Tate, a father has sex with his daughter. In Rainbow Party, teens make plans for an oral sex party. And in Teach Me, out next week and seemingly ripped from the day's headlines, there's a student-teacher affair.” While I am not aware of challenges to any of these specific books, there probably will be some if they find their way into schools. Recent disputes over books in Lexington, Massachusetts, Pleasant Valley, Iowa and Columbus, Ohio have divided communities and led to legal action.
Perhaps the mother of all of these disputes over school reading material is in Fayetteville, Arkansas. Laurie Taylor, a mother of two school-age children [and prayer action leader for Concerned Women for America], recently found numerous volumes of fiction that vividly describe sexual acts of all sorts. Doing It features teacher-pupil sex, Rainbow Boys describes adult-teen unprotected homosexual sex, and Choke, uncovering the world of sexaholics, was graphic enough to have portions excerpted in Playboy. Perhaps the worst find was Push, by author Sapphire. Filled with graphic sex, the book’s low point is the lead character's description of sex with an infant.
Mrs. Taylor is formally challenging these and other fiction books with similar content. While she believes that some books are not suitable for any ages and should be removed, she is asking that librarians gain a parent's permission before allowing children to have access to others with questionable content. She also wants the school to follow its own review policy while parents mediate children’s access. The Fayetteville district requires schools to review materials that parents find objectionable.
For these reasonable requests, she has been pilloried in the local press as narrow minded and bigoted. The school district has received a veiled threat of a lawsuit from national groups including the National Coalition Against Censorship, a front for pornography producers.
Is Mrs. Taylor overreacting? Should these books be in public school libraries? Before I throw in my view, let me jump back to the MSNBC article on racy teen novels. Reporter Shamlian writes: “Experts say books like these are gratuitous – even dangerous – and parents need to know that.” She then quotes a specialist in adolescent psychiatry, Dr. John Sargent: “They buy it, thinking they're doing something nice for their kid, when, in fact, they have no clue what it is they're exposing their kid to.”
I agree with Dr. Sargent. Such reading material can be counterproductive to a healthy view of sexuality. Some of these books normalize and even glamorize sexual behavior that most educators and parents would like to prevent. Surely there are other ways to provide an education on topics touched by these books. What should public schools do about such gratuitous material?
Where a review panel of parents and teachers cannot agree about the appropriateness of a contested book, parental permission should be required. If teachers want to use explicit portions of contested books, then parents should be notified. Schools should allow parents to have a clue about what their kids are exposed to. Such a policy does no violence to free speech, nor is it censorship. If some parents want raunchy to join readin', 'ritin' and 'rithmetic, they are free to buy their own children sexually explicit material for consumption at home.
Warren Throckmorton, Ph.D., who writes periodically for Concerned Women for America’s Web site, is an associate professor of psychology and fellow for psychology and public policy in the Center for Vision and Values at Grove City (Pennsylvania) College. Dr. Throckmorton is past president of the American Mental Health Counselors Association and is the producer of the documentary I Do Exist about sexual orientation change. His columns have been published by over 70 newspapers nationwide and can be contacted through his website. |
|
Concerned Women for America 1015 Fifteenth St. N.W., Suite 1100 Washington, D.C. 20005 Phone: (202) 488-7000 Fax: (202) 488-0806 |
Feedback / Questions? || Problem with this page? || Archives
